|
|
|
|
|
Clinical significance analysis of the ratio of C-reactive protein to albumin for predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with septic shock |
Chen Mu-dan, Chen Jian-liang, Wang Jin-zhu, Yang Xiang-hong, Sun Ren-hua, Li Qian |
Department of Intensive Care Unit,Pan′an People′s Hospital, Pan′an 322300, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To discuss the clinical significance of the ratio (CRP/ALB) of C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin (ALB) for predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with septic shock. Methods 141 cases with septic shock admitted at department of intensive care unit (ICU) of Zhejiang Provincial People′s Hospital from January 2015 to June 2016 were selected as investigation individuals and divided into the ARDS group and control group. To compare the levels of CRP, ALB and CRP/ALB at time of admission to ICU and the acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ score), sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score), lactic acid (Lac) and oxygenation index(OI) at 7th day after admission to ICU of the two groups. To analyze the correlation between the CRP/ALB at time of admission to ICU and the APACHEⅡ score, SOFA score,Lac and OI at 7th day after admission to ICU and draw the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) of CRP/ALB for predicting ARDS and find the best cut-off score. Results Of the 141 cases with septic shock, the incidence rate of ARDS was 32.62%(46/141).There were no statistical significances about levels of CRP and ALB at time of admission to ICU (all P>0.05), while the CRP/ALB(3.04±0.35 vs. 2.39±0.29, t=4.625)of the ARDS group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).At 7th day after admission to ICU the APACHEⅡ score (25.24±5.84 vs. 17.65±4.26, t=4.563), SOFA score (4.25±1.36 vs. 2.03±0.95, t=3.685) and Lac(3.04±0.35 vs. 2.39±0.29, t=4.625)of the ARDS group were significantly higher than those of the control group, while the OI(243.15±36.52 vs. 305.62±39.45, t=-3.752)was obviously lower than that of the control group,differences were all statistically significant (all P<0.05).Correlation analysis showed that the CRP/ALB at time of admission to ICU was positively correlated with the APACHEⅡ score,SOFA score and level of Lac while negatively correlated with OI of at 7th day after admission to ICU (r values were respectively 0.653, 0.603, 0.596 and -0.795, all P<0.05). Conclusion The CRP/ALB has a high clinical value for predicting ARDS in patients with septic shock. It can help to evaluate the illness state and is worth popularizing in clinical application.
|
Received: 12 December 2017
|
Corresponding Authors:
Li Qian, E-mail:ouyangyisheng@163.com
|
|
|
|
[1]Yi M, Yao G, Guo X. Value of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output monitoring of cardiac function in septic shock patients:a prospective study[J]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue, 2015, 27(1):22-27. [2]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8) : 801- 810.
[3]ProCESS Investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370 (18):1683-1693.
[4]Oliveira CF, Botoni FA, Oliveira CR, et al. Precalcitonin versus C-reactive protein for guiding antibiotic therapy in sepsis:a randomized trial[J]. Crit Care Med, 2013, 41(10):2336-2343.
[5]Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39(2):165-228.
[6]ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome:the Berlin definition[J]. JAMA, 2012, 307(23):2526-2533.
[7]张荷英.脓毒症患者死亡的危险因素分析[J].中国现代医生, 2012, 50(24):35-37.
[8]梅华鲜,李永胜,陈正平,等.毛细血管渗漏指数在脓毒症并ARDS早期诊断中的应用[J].新医学, 2016, 47(10):681-685.
[9]Ndrepepa G, Braun S, Cassese S, et al. C-reactive protein and prognosis in women and men with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 2013, 14(5):264-269.
[10]李怀云.血清前白蛋白、C反应蛋白、载脂蛋白A1对重症肺炎患者生存状况的评估价值[J].安徽医药, 2014, 18(8):1517-1519.
[11]曾文新,曾红科,柳学,等.C反应蛋白与白蛋白比值在急性A型主动脉夹层手术患者预后预测中的价值[J].中华急诊医学杂志, 2016, 25(6):764-768.
[12]周兵,赵湛元.hs-CRP/PAB对急性心肌梗死患者发生心力衰竭的预测效果[J].河北医学, 2015, 21(9):1429-1433.
[13]江稳强,曾文新,朱高峰,等.C反应蛋白白蛋白比值在预测尿感染性休克患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的意义[J].中国急救医学, 2014, 34(7):577-580.
[14]卢婷.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者血清C反应蛋白与白蛋白比值、丙二醛含量变化的研究[J].世界临床医学, 2016, 10(23):72,74. |
|
|
|