|
|
|
|
|
Correlation study between autophagy of brain cells in rats with carbon monoxide poisoning and delayed encephalopathy |
Zhang De-xin, Zhan Jie, Wang Xiao-xia, Lv Xin-peng, Deng Ying |
Department of Emergency, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the correlation between autophagy and delayed encephalopathy after carbon monoxide poisoning (DEACMP). Methods Rats with carbon monoxide poisoning were randomly divided into control group, autophagy antagonist (3-MA) group and autophagy inducer (rapamycin, Rapa) group. After 14 days, the rats were divided into delayed encephalopathy group and non-delayed encephalopathy group. To observe the number of rats with delayed encephalopathy in each group, HE staining, electron microscopy, flow cytometry and Western blotting were used to compare and analyze the brain cells of rats. Results There were 9, 12, 4 rats developed delayed encephalopathy in control group, autophagy antagonist group and autophagy inducer group, respectively. Neuronal degeneration and necrosis were shown in hippocampus of rats with delayed encephalopathy. Mild injury was shown in rats with non-delayed encephalopathy. The rate of apoptosis in delayed encephalopathy group was higher than that in non-delayed group [(6.1±0.7)% vs.(1.6±0.2)%, P=0.018]. In the delayed encephalopathy group, the rate of apoptosis in 3-MA group was higher than that in control group [(19.6±2.8)% vs.(6.3±0.7)%,P=0.013]; the rate of apoptosis in rapamycin group was lower than that in control group [(2.3±0.4)% vs.(6.3±0.7)% (P=0.033). The levels of LC3-Ⅱ, beclin-1, bcl-2 in the delayed encephalopathy group were (2.37±0.25, 1.17±0.19, 1.10±0.25), respectively, which were lower than those in the non-delayed encephalopathy group (P=0.006,0.019,0.022), the level of bax was (4.80±0.29), which was higher than that of non-delayed encephalopathy (P=0.022). In the delayed encephalopathy group, the levels of LC3-Ⅱ, beclin-1, bcl-2 in 3-MA group were (1.10±0.14), (0.40±0.08),(0.43±0.05), respectively, which were lower than those in the control group (P=0.043,0.013,0.044), the level of bax was (7.37±0.33), which was higher than that in control group (P=0.027). The level of LC3-Ⅱ, beclin-1, bcl-2 in rapamycin group was (4.53±0.53), (2.07±0.05), (2.47±0.13), which was higher than that in control group (P=0.009,0.028,0.004). The level of bax was (7.37±0.33), which was lower than that in control group (P=0.008). Conclusion Autophagy plays a protective role in the injury of rat brain cells caused by carbon monoxide, which can prevent and reduce the occurrence and development of DEACMP in rats. Inhibition of autophagy can aggravate the damage of carbon monoxide to brain cells, promote or aggravate the occurrence and development of DEACMP in rats.
|
|
|
|
|
[1]Zhang Y, Chen X, Zhao Y, et al. The role of ubiquitin proteasomal system and autophagy-lysosome pathway in Alzheimer′s disease[J]. Rev Neurosci, 2017, 28(8): 861-868.
[2]张晓莉. 急性一氧化碳中毒后迟发性脑病大鼠模型的建立及其表型评价[D].新乡医学院, 2016.
[3]Jing CH, Wang L, Liu PP, et al. Autophagy activation is associated with neuroprotection against apoptosis via a mitochondrial pathway in a rat model of subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Neuroscience, 2012, 213: 144-153.
[4]Fu J, Wang H, Gao J, et al. Rapamycin Effectively Impedes Melamine-Induced Impairments of Cognition and Synaptic Plasticity in Wistar Rats[J]. Mol Neurobiol, 2017, 54(2): 819-832.
[5]Mizushima N, Levine B. Autophagy in mammalian development and differentiation[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2010, 12(9): 823-830.
[6]Juri DM, Finderle, uput D, et al. The effectiveness of oxygen therapy in carbon monoxide poisoning is pressure-and time-dependent: a study on cultured astrocytes[J]. Toxicol Lett, 2015, 233(1): 16-23.
[7]Hess DR. Inhaled Carbon Monoxide: From Toxin to Therapy[J]. Respir Care, 2017, 62(10): 1333-1342.
[8]Schaaf MB, Cojocari D, Keulers TG, et al. The autophagy associated gene, ULK1, promotes tolerance to chronic and acute hypoxia[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2013, 108(3): 529-534.
[9]Liu Z, Lenardo MJ. Reactive oxygen species regulate autophagy through redox-sensitive proteases[J]. Dev Cell, 2007, 12(4): 484-485.
[10]Lv B, Hua T, Li F, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α protects mesenchymal stem cells against oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced injury via autophagy induction and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2017, 9(5): 2492-2499.
[11]So KY, Oh SH. Cadmium-induced heme-oxygenase-1 expression plays dual roles in autophagy and apoptosis and is regulated by both PKC-δ and PKB/Akt activation in NRK52E kidney cells[J]. Toxicology, 2016, 370: 49-59.
[12]Zhang X, Yu L, Xu H. Lysosome calcium in ROS regulation of autophagy[J]. Autophagy, 2016, 12(10): 1954-1955.
[13]Carroll B, Dunlop EA. The lysosome: a crucial hub for AMPK and mTORC1 signalling[J]. Biochem J, 2017, 474(9): 1453-1466.
[14]Bourdenx M, Dehay B. Autophagy and brain: the case of neurodegenerative diseases[J]. Med Sci (Paris), 2017, 33(3): 268-274.
[15]Yamamoto A, Yue Z. Autophagy and its normal and pathogenic states in the brain[J]. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2014, 37: 55-78.
[16]Sheng R, Zhang LS, Han R, et al. Autophagy activation is associated with neuroprotection in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemic preconditioning[J]. Autophagy, 2010, 6(4): 482-494.
[17]Yang J, Yao S. JNK-Bcl-2/Bcl-xL-Bax/Bak Pathway Mediates the Crosstalk between Matrine-Induced Autophagy and Apoptosis via Interplay with Beclin 1[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2015, 16(10): 25 744-25 758.
[18]Kang R,Zeh HJ,Lotze MT,et al. The Beclin 1 network regulates autophagy and apoptosis[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2011, 18(4): 571-580.
[19]Liang C.Negative regulation of autophagy[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2010, 17(12): 1807-1815.
[20]Wang YC, Zhang S, Du TY, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury by stimulating autophagy in neurocyte[J]. Brain Res, 2010, 1323: 149-151.
[21]Yan W, Zhang H, Bai X, et al. Autophagy activation is involved in neuroprotection induced by hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning against focal cerebral ischemia in rats[J]. Brain Res, 2011, 1402: 109-121. |
|
|
|