|
|
|
|
|
The diagnostic value of inflammatory markers and D-dimer level in secondary infection of acute pancreatitis |
Liu Si-yuan, Zhang Hong |
Department of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of procalcitonin(PCT), C-reactive protein(CRP), white blood cell(WBC) and D-dimer in the assessment of secondary infection in patients with acute pancreatitis(AP). Methods A total of 123 cases with pancreatitis were selected by retrospective method. These patients were divided into the infected group(n=53) and the uninfected group(n=70) based on with or without secondary abdominal infection within a month after admission, then the infection group(n=37) was divided into local infection group(n=16) and severe infection group according to the severity of infection. These indicators were compared between the infected and uninfected group, local infection group and severe infection group. Results Significant difference of PCT, CRP and D-dimer were found between the infected and uninfected groups with [2.43 (1.21-6.21)] ng/mLvs.[0.32 (0.10-0.93)] ng/mL, (158.03±132.62) mg/L vs. (79.26±80.10) mg/L and (7.28±4.56) μg/mL vs. (2.07±1.86) μg/mL (P<0.05). The difference of WBC between the two groups was not significant with (14.59±4.99)×109/L vs. (12.73±5.42)×109/L(P=0.053) respectively. The difference of PCT was significant between local infection and severe group with (3.04±3.36) ng/mL vs. (15.02±14.83) ng/mL (P<0.05). The difference of CRP, D-dimer and WBC between the two groups was not significant with (156.83±142.94) mg/L vs. (160.80±109.17) mg/L, (7.20±4.00) μg/mL vs. (7.46±5.81) μg/L,and (14.39±4.67)×109/L vs. (15.07±5.79)×109/L(P>0.05). The diagnostic value of D-dimer level is better than PCT, CRP level. The area under the ROC was 0.917 with sensitivity 90.6%,specificity 78.6%. Conclusion PCT, CRP and D-dimer level in blood can be used as indicators for diagnosis of secondary infectin in patients with pancreatitis; and D-dimer is better than using PCT and CRP after admission, but the PCT level can diagnose severity of infection.
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Zhang Hong, E-mail: zhanghong20070703@ 163.com
|
|
|
|
[1]中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组. 急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2014)[J].中华外科杂志, 2015, 53(1):50-53.
[2]Meher S, Mishra TS, Sasmal PK, et al. Role of Biomarkers in Diagnosis and Prognostic Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis[J]. J Biomark, 2015: 519-534.
[3]Wang G, Wu R, Guo F, et al. Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on the inflammatory response and bacterial translocation in intraabdominal infection[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2014, 24(3): 199-204.
[4]Yanl, Li QF, Rong YT,et al. The protective effects of rutaecarpine on acute pancreatitis[J]. Oncol Lett, 2018, 15(3): 3121-3126.
[5]冯所远,符史健. 血清淀粉酶、C 反应蛋白、降钙素原与尿胰蛋白酶原激活肽联合检测对急性胰腺炎的诊断价值[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 27(3): 377-381.
[6]Pupelis G, Drozdova N, Mukans M, et al. Serum procalcitonin is a sensitive marker for septic shock and mortality in secondary perito-nitis[J]. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther, 2014, 46(4): 262-273.
[7]Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Thomann R, et al. Effect of procalcitonin-based guidelines vs standard guidelines on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections:the ProHOSP randomized controlled trial[J]. JAMA, 2009, 302(10): 1059-1066.
[8]Bouadma L, Luyt CE, Tubach F, et al. Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients′exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units(PRORATA trial):a multicentrerandomised controlled[J]. Lancet, 2010, 375(9713): 463-474.
[9]陈淼,林晓军,张红璇,等. 降钙素原和C反应蛋白在肺炎合并浓度血症中的意义[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2017, 26(7): 807-810.
[10]傅之妍,黄斌,黄韵. PCT 和 NT- proBNP 对脓毒血症患者生存状况的预测价值[J]. 安徽医药, 2015,19(3): 513-514,515.
[11]罗丽娅,熊灿,陈晓琴. 早期血清降钙素原和C反应蛋白检测对感染性胰腺坏死的预测价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2018, 34(2): 346-349.
[12]Souza YM, Fontes B, Martins JO, et al. Evaluation of the effects of ozone therapy in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection in rats[J]. Clinics(Sao Paulo), 2010, 65(2): 195-202.
[13]Gao H, liu H, Li Y. Value of D-dimer levels for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: An analysis of 32 cases with computed tomography pulmonary angiography[J].Exp Ther Med, 16(2): 1554-1560.
[14]Dhainaut JF, Shorr AF, Macias WL, et al. Dynamic evolution of coagulopathy in the first day of severe sepsis:relationship with mortality and organ failure[J]. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33(2): 341-348
[15]郑照炼,郭强,胡伟明. D-二聚体在预测急性胰腺炎患者预后中的作用[J]. 华西医学, 2016, 31(9): 1530-1533. |
|
|
|