摘要 目的 研究应用尿中性粒细胞明胶酶相关载脂蛋白(neutrophil gelatinase-associated apolipoprotein, NGAL)指导的集束化治疗是否能改善脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤(AKI)的预后。 方法 入选尿NGAL>130 ng/mL的脓毒症患者,分为标准治疗组与集束化治疗组,比较两组患者的基础临床特征及相关预后。 结果 ①集束化治疗组与标准治疗组比较,第1天液体输入量更高[(4078±849)mL vs. (2664±828)mL,P<0.001)],而第3天液体输入量更少[(2277±733)mL vs. (3086±1056)mL,P<0.001];②集束化治疗组与标准治疗组比较,采用保护性机械通气策略的比例更高(100.0% vs. 87.9%,P<0.001),28 d内机械通气时间更长(22 d vs. 19 d,P<0.001);③集束化治疗组与标准治疗组比较,ICU住院时间更短(9.5 d vs. 10.0 d,P=0.002),肾脏替代治疗比例更低(30.9% vs. 45.5%,P=0.014)。 结论 集束化治疗可以缩短脓毒症相关性AKI患者的ICU住院时间,提高肾脏功能康复率。
王晶晶,李竞,王勇强,窦琳. 集束化治疗对脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤的影响[J]. 中国急救医学, 2019, 39(7): 654-658.
Wang Jing-jing, Li Jing, Wang Yong-qiang, Dou Lin. Influence of care bundle on sepsis related acute kidney injury. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 2019, 39(7): 654-658.
[1]Kolhe NV, Reilly T, Leung J, et al. A simple care bundle for use in acute kidney injury: a propensity score-matched cohort study[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2016, 31(11): 1846-1854.
[2]Gao F, Melody T, Daniels DF, et al. The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study[J]. Crit Care, 2005, 9(6): R764-770.
[3]Resar R, Pronovost P, Haraden C, et al. Using a bundle approach to improve ventilator care processes and reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia[J]. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2005, 31(5): 243-248.
[4]Gcze I, Jauch D, Gtz M, et al. Biomarker-guided intervention to prevent acute kidney injury after major surgery: the prospective randomized bigpAK study[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(6): 1013-1020.
[5]Kolhe NV, Staples D, Reilly T, et al. Impact of compliance with a care bundle on acute kidney injury outcomes: a prospective observational study[J]. PloS one, 2015, 10(7): e0132279.
[6]Chawla LS, Bellomo R, Bihorac A, et al. Acute kidney disease and renal recovery: consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 16 Workgroup[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2017, 13(4): 241-257.
[7]Kellum JA. How can we define recovery after acute kidney injury considerations from epidemiology and clinical trial design[J]. Nephron Clin Pract, 2014, 127(1-4): 81-88.
[8]Bagshaw SM. Acute kidney injury care bundles [J]. Nephron, 2015, 131(4): 247-251.
[9]Selby NM, Kolhe NV. Care bundles for acute kidney injury: do they work [J]. Nephron, 2016, 134(3): 195-199.
[10]Nickolas TL, O′Rourke MJ, Yang J, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a single emergency department measurement of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for diagnosing acute kidney injury[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2008, 148(11): 810-819.
[11]Zappitelli M, Washburn KK, Arikan AA, et al. Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is an early marker of acute kidney injury in critically ill children: a prospective cohort study[J]. Crit care, 2007, 11(4): R84.
[12]Marik P, Bellomo R. A rational approach to fluid therapy in sepsis[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2016, 116(3): 339-349.
[13]Eskesen TG, Wetterslv M, Perner A. Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2016, 42(3): 324-332.
[14]赵亚杰,曹江北,米卫东. 肺保护性通气策略在围手术期的应用进展[J].临床麻醉学杂志, 2016, 32(12):1229-1232.
[15]Hamzaoui O, Scheeren TWL, Teboul JL. Norepinephrine in septic shock: when and how much[J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2017, 23(4): 342-347.
[16]Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update[J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(6): 997-1000.
[17]Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, et al. Effect of early vs delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: the ELAIN randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(20): 2190-2199.