摘要目的 探讨血清miR-29及miR-150对急性肾损伤(AKI)患者预后的预测价值。方法 选取2016-01~2017-12海南省第三人民医院收治的AKI患者126例,根据其28 d的生存情况分为存活组(82例)和死亡组(44例),按AKI分期标准分为AKI 1期(57例)、AKI 2期(40例)、AKI 3期(29例)。采用RT-PCR检测各组血清miR-29及miR-150表达水平,并记录AKI患者确诊时APACHEⅡ评分。应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析miR-29及miR-150对AKI患者预后评估的价值。采用Pearson相关分析评价AKI患者血清miR-29、miR-150水平与APACHEⅡ评分的相关性。〖HTH〗结果〓〖HTSS〗死亡组血清miR-29(3.14±0.96 vs. 1.93±0.42)及miR-150(4.26±1.18 vs. 2.05±0.48)表达水平明显高于存活组(t=10.703、15.106,P<0.001)。AKI 3期血清miR-29(3.34±1.08 vs. 2.19±0.61和1.85±0.34)及miR-150(3.92±1.15 vs. 2.80±0.91和2.55±0.84)表达水平明显高于AKI 2期和AKI 1期(F=5.124、7.825,P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示,血清miR-29及miR-150预测AKI预后的最佳截断值分别为2.74、3.83,二者联合[AUC(95%CI):0.918(0.852~0.974)]预测AKI预后的敏感度和特异度较好,分别为93.6%和86.5%。相关分析显示,miR-29水平与miR-150水平呈正相关(r=0.806,P<0.01),miR-29、miR-150水平与APACHEⅡ评分均呈正相关(r=0.634、r=0.702,P<0.01)。结论血清miR-29及miR-150表达水平与AKI患者病情严重程度相关,可能成为AKI治疗和预后判断的新靶点。
温莉玲,陈家佳,梁红丽,符明昌. 血清miR-29及miR-150对急性肾损伤患者预后的预测价值[J]. 中国急救医学, 2018, 38(7): 581-585.
Wen Li-ling, Chen Jia-jia, Liang Hong-li, Fu Ming-chang. Prognostic value of serum miR-29 and miR-150 in patients with acute renal injury. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 2018, 38(7): 581-585.
[1]Lameire NH, Bagga A, Cruz D, et al. Acute kidney injury: an increasing global concern[J]. Lancet, 2013, 382(9887): 170-179.
[2]Kellum JA, Prowle JR. Paradigms of acute kidney injury in the intensive care setting[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2018, 14(4): 217-230.
[3]Li Z, Rana TM. Therapeutic targeting of microRNAs: current status and future challenges[J]. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2014, 13(8): 622-638.
[4]Kriegel AJ, Liu Y, Fang Y, et al. The miR-29 family: genomics, cell biology, and relevance to renal and cardiovascular injury[J]. Physiol Genomics, 2012, 44(4): 237-244.
[5]Ranganathan P, Jayakumar C, Tang Y, et al. MicroRNA-150 deletion in mice protects kidney from myocardial infarction-induced acute kidney injury[J]. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2015, 309(6): F551-F558.
[6]Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury[J]. Nephron Clin Pract, 2012, 120(4): c179-c184.
[7]Hershkovitz-Rokah O, Geva P, Salmon-Divon M, et al. Network analysis of microRNAs, genes and their regulation in diffuse and follicular B-cell lymphomas[J]. Oncotarget, 2018, 9(8): 7928-7941.
[8]赵阳, 崔丽艳. microRNA作为急性肾损伤早期诊断生物标志物的研究进展[J].中华检验医学杂志, 2017, 40(8): 633-636.
[9]Xu L, Qi X, Duan S, et al. MicroRNAs: potential biomarkers for disease diagnosis[J]. Biomed Mater Eng, 2014, 24(6): 3917-3925.
[10]Wang B, Komers R, Carew R, et al. Suppression of microRNA-〖JP〗29 expression by TGF-β1 promotes collagen expression and renal fibrosis[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2012, 23(2): 252-265.
[11]Zhou H, Hasni SA, Perez P, et al. miR-150 promotes renal fibrosis in lupus nephritis by downregulating SOCS1[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013, 24(7): 1073-1087.
[12]Lorenzen JM, Kielstein JT, Hafer C, et al. Circulating miR-210 predicts survival in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2011, 6(7): 1540-1546.
[13]Wang N, Zhou Y, Jiang L, et al. Urinary microRNA-10a and microRNA-30 d serve as novel, sensitive and specific biomarkers for kidney injury[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(12): e51140.
[14]Lorenzen JM, Kaucsar T, Schauerte C, et al. MicroRNA-24 antagonism prevents renal ischemia reperfusion injury[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2014, 25(12): 2717-2729.
[15]Martino F, Lorenzen J, Schmidt J, et al. Circulating microRNAs are not eliminated by hemodialysis[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(6): e38269.
[16]宁莉, 魏殿军. 急性肾损伤相关miRNA的研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2017, 57(14): 110-112.
[17]Banaei S. Novel role of microRNAs in renal ischemia reperfusion injury[J]. Ren Fail, 2015, 37(7): 1073-1079.